Jury Rejects Disability Discrimination and Failure to Accommodate Claims

Welder making boilers for a ship, Combustion E...

Image by The Library of Congress via Flickr

In a wage and hour, failure to accommodate, and disability discrimination case, a welder alleged that his employer terminated him because of his intestinal ailment.  Cubias v. Murray’s Iron Works Inc., 7 Trials Digest 14th 14, 2010 WL 5690615, Case No. BC406749 (Cal. Superior, Verdict: July 29, 2010).

Plaintiff alleged that he was employed as an aluminum welder until defendant Murray’s Iron Works terminated his employment.  Plaintiff alleged he was harassed and terminated, when he disclosed his medical condition/disability called diverticulosis or diverticular disease., which occurred when pressure in plaintiff’s colon formed bulging pouches that can cause severe stomach cramps, aches, constipation, and/or diarrhea. Id.

Plaintiff alleged disability discrimination, failure to provide reasonable accommodation, failure to engage in the interactive process, unlawful retaliation, unlawful retaliation in violation of public policy, harassment, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, failure to prevent discrimination and harassment, failure to prevent retaliation, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and failure to pay overtime wages against defendant Murray’s Iron Works.  Id. Against defendant Irene Leisner, the Human Resources Manager and co-owner of Murray’s Iron Works, plaintiff alleged harassment, invasion of right to privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress for allegedly entering the men’s restroom at work and yelling at him to get back to work and to hurry up while he was using the restroom. Id.

The jury found that: plaintiff had a disability but found that it was not a motivating reason for his termination; plaintiff did not request an accommodation; he was not terminated in violation of public policy; defendants’ conduct was not outrageous; defendants did not invade plaintiff’s privacy, and defendant Murray’s Iron Works did not willfully fail to pay the full amount of wages earned by plaintiff on his last day of employment.  Id. But Plaintiff was awarded $212 against defendant Murray’s Iron Works on the cause of action for violation of Labor Code sections 201 and 203, for failure to pay all wages that are earned and unpaid are due immediately at the time of termination.

Judges and Attorneys

Judge Kevin C. Brazile

For Plaintiff:  Richard Y. Chen, Torey J. Favarote, Paul M. Gleason, Tuyet T. Nguyen, Janet S. Yavrouian, of Gleason & Favarote, Los Angeles.

For Defendant:  Paul M. Kelley and Amy Semmel, of Donfeld, Kelley & Rollman, Los Angeles.

By CHARLES JUNG

 

About these ads
Tagged , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: